ATNOS: Difference between revisions

From CYANA Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Automated NOESY peak picking
''Automated NOESY peak picking''
 


ATNOS is a software for automated NOESY peak picking and NOE signal identification in homonuclear 2D and heteronuclear-resolved 3D [<sup>1</sup>H,<sup>1</sup>H]-NOESY spectra during de novo protein structure determination by NMR. By incorporating the analysis of the raw NMR data into the process of automated de novo protein structure determination, ATNOS enables direct feedback between the protein structure, the NOE assignments and the experimental NOESY spectra.
ATNOS is a software for automated NOESY peak picking and NOE signal identification in homonuclear 2D and heteronuclear-resolved 3D [<sup>1</sup>H,<sup>1</sup>H]-NOESY spectra during de novo protein structure determination by NMR. By incorporating the analysis of the raw NMR data into the process of automated de novo protein structure determination, ATNOS enables direct feedback between the protein structure, the NOE assignments and the experimental NOESY spectra.

Latest revision as of 14:30, 23 January 2009

Automated NOESY peak picking


ATNOS is a software for automated NOESY peak picking and NOE signal identification in homonuclear 2D and heteronuclear-resolved 3D [1H,1H]-NOESY spectra during de novo protein structure determination by NMR. By incorporating the analysis of the raw NMR data into the process of automated de novo protein structure determination, ATNOS enables direct feedback between the protein structure, the NOE assignments and the experimental NOESY spectra.

Availability

  • ATNOS was first implemented as part of an in-house version of the program DYANA that is not available for distribution.

References

  • Herrmann, T., Güntert, P. & Wüthrich, K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE-identification in the NOESY spectra using the new software ATNOS. J. Biomol. NMR 24, 171–189 (2002)